Foreclosed
Coherent argument, decisively rejected by courts.
Partially Supported
Core observation has merit; conclusion is overstated.
Supported
Doctrinally sound. Primary sources confirm the claim.
Unresolved
Doctrine is genuinely contested or internally inconsistent.
Unsupported
Does not survive examination against primary sources.

Featured Essays

All Essays
Claims Partially Supported

W2 Wages, Cost Basis, and the Asymmetry the Tax Code Won't Explain

The claim that wages aren't 'income' has been rejected by every federal court that's heard it. But buried inside the losing argument is a genuine observation: labor is the only factor of production denied a cost basis. That asymmetry is real, indefensible, and worth understanding on its own terms.

14 min read May 6, 2026
  • income
  • basis
  • wages
  • sixteenth-amendment
  • section-3401
  • cost-recovery
Practice

How to Find Defects in Your Charging Instrument

A charging instrument — indictment, information, complaint, or citation — has a specific job: to place the defendant within the reach of a criminal statute, allege every element of the offense, establish the court's jurisdiction, and provide adequate notice. This essay walks through six categories of defects (jurisdictional, definitional, constitutional, charging-sufficiency, formal/technical, and process/service) and a six-step reading method for identifying them. The single most important rule in the area is procedural: most defects are waivable, and they are waived by failing to raise them at the right time.

25 min read May 10, 2026
Claims Unsupported

Brushaber: What the Case Actually Says

*Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.*, 240 U.S. 1 (1916), is the most-cited and most-misread case in the alternate-tax movement. *The Federal Zone* and its derivatives read Brushaber as treating Frank Brushaber as a 'nonresident alien' and limiting the income tax to a 'federal zone.' The Court's actual opinion contains neither of those holdings. What it contains is a careful resolution of the *Pollock* / Sixteenth Amendment tension that produces the opposite conclusion: the Sixteenth Amendment removed the source-of-income consideration from the apportionment analysis, leaving the income tax operative as a constitutional indirect tax. Layered onto that, the IRC's own definition of 'nonresident alien' at 26 U.S.C. § 7701(b)(1)(B) — 'an individual who is neither a citizen of the United States nor a resident of the United States' — forecloses the territorial-volunteer reading at the statutory level. The Brushaber reinterpretation fails at primary source.

18 min read May 10, 2026

Latest Findings

All Findings